Although I've certainly consumed and enjoyed a lot of Star Trek in my
life, I have to admit it has many
shortcomings as science fiction, that is, as fiction that takes for
its starting point speculations about the future state of
science. Although I don't doubt that the writers of the various
forms of Star Trek are both competent professionals and
talented artists, they've been burdened by difficult positions taken
at the very creation of the original show, and ever since have had
to decide how much of this past they can shrug off.
One of the more problematic legacies of the show's origin is the
transporter (another, Star Trek's laughable treatment
of economics, should probably get a whole treatise rather than just
a blog post, but I'll leave that for another time), which is one of
those technologies sometimes posited in science fiction stories
that, for various reasons, writers fail to fully explore. One of the
most common reasons is that some technologies (or, in the
case of superheroes, some powers) are altogether too
powerful, and the consequences of that power pose a problem for
storytelling; if characters have godlike abilities at their command,
what room does that leave for drama, for tension and its relief, for
a satisfying plot?